Original Article: Data Analysis Share

Copy or email the link to share Patients with Multiple Positive COVID-19 Tests.

COPY

EMAIL

Patients with Multiple Positive COVID-19 Tests

  • Jeff Trinkl, MD
  • Melissa Gaisser, MS
Posted on

For numerous reasons, some patients are tested for SARS-CoV-2 virus multiple times, and a small percentage of patients test positive more than once. We were interested in better understanding how often patients undergo multiple tests, and what the time frame is between the first and last positive results. We speculate that fewer days between repeat positive results likely represents a true positive for live virus. A longer day separation seems to better support the concept of PCR tests detecting non-active viral RNA, as suggested in a recent article from the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC).1

Expand
Figure 1. COVID-19 tested patients, by test result. Callout graph shows subsequent testing information for patients who tested positive for COVID-19.

Our sample included 1,184,442 patients who were tested as of June 3, 2020. 158,476 patients (13.4%) had at least one positive test. Of these positive patients, 15,998 (10.1%) had a second positive test while 11,958 (7.5%) subsequently only had negative test results.

For patients with two or more positive tests, we looked at the number of days between the first positive test and last positive test. 44.7% of patients had 1 to 14 days of separation. The remainder of the patients ranged from 15 to 79 days.

Expand

The United States CDC estimates an infected patient is likely to be non-contagious after approximately 10 days.2 For the short interval retest positive patients (1-14 days between first and last positive), we suspect in most cases both of the patients’ positive test results are detecting live virus. The longer interval group (greater than 14 days of test separation) is more interesting considering the likelihood that active virus is no longer present. Possible explanations for this finding include longer than average live viral shedding, detection of non-infectious viral RNA breakdown products, or possible reinfection. Recent studies, such as the KCDC brief, suggest the COVID-19 PCR test is detecting non-infectious viral breakdown products. In the KCDC study, 285 patients with positive retesting underwent contact tracing and a subset of 108 patients had viral cell culture testing. No cultures were positive, and investigation of 790 contacts of the study patients revealed no newly confirmed cases from exposure. Their findings do not support the possible explanation that patients were reinfected.

Considering early research suggesting PCR tests detect non-infectious SARS-CoV-2 RNA for weeks to months beyond symptom onset, it seems a hypothesis of reinfection is less likely.3 We plan to continue collecting PCR test data to investigate if the retest positive rate changes as the time interval between the first and last positive test increases. Evaluation of future test data may give some insights into how long a patient is immune to reinfection after a COVID-19 infection.


Data are pooled from 52 health systems representing 259 hospitals that span 26 states and cover 15 million patients.

1 Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. “Findings from investigation and analysis of re-positive cases.” (May 19, 2020) https://www.cdc.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a30402000000&bid=0030&act=view&list_no=367267&nPage=1

2 Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. “Symptom-Based Strategy to Discontinue Isolation for Persons with COVID-19” (May 3, 2020) https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/strategy-discontinue-isolation.html

3 Xi He, Eric H.Y. Lau, Peng Wu, Xilong Deng, Jian Wang, Xinxin Hao, Yiu Chung Lau, et al. “Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19” Nature Medicine 26, 672–675 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5

The article was updated July 3 to clarify that the percentage of patients with a second positive test—10.1%—relates to the total number of patients with at least one positive test, not the total number of patients who received a second test.

1 Comment

  1. Since you are looking into patients with multiple positive tests, the denominator shouldn’t be the total of initial positive tests (158,476), but of people tested twice (27,956). (Since we don’t know how the non-tested people would have tested.) Therefore the percentage of multiple positive tests, for people tested twice, is 57.22%. Not a small percentage.

    *Of these positive patients, 27,956 were tested again after their initial positive test. For those patients with multiple tests, 15,998 (57.22%) had a second positive test.

  2. My wife works for an assisted living facility near Syracuse NY. Ten of the employees tested positive and were quarantined. Before they could return to work, they each had to test negative twice. They all tested negative twice and returned to work. Then 8 of the 10 tested positive again and were quarantined again. In fact, over the course of almost 3 months, one of the employees tested positive 4 times, while testing negative twice in between each positive test, and was subsequently quarantined 4 times. Another one had tested positive 3 times.

    Yes, this is all anecdotal, but to my wife and I, and to the employees of this facility, the utter lack of reliability of these tests is very real. Suffice it to say, there is considerable frustration, especially since the governor of New York has required them to test weekly.

    I would not be surprised if this is quite common, but would not be reported widely due to the financial incentive of the tests themselves, which would be undermined should people realize how unreliable the tests really are.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *. View our comment guidelines.